More work!!!

This commit is contained in:
Starystars67
2026-06-27 00:49:53 +01:00
parent 97a7aaf643
commit c115bc9a42
302 changed files with 28263 additions and 10 deletions
+33
View File
@@ -242,6 +242,39 @@ docs/
4. Add cross-links and “Start here” blocks on section index pages.
5. Optionally reorganize URLs later if needed.
## Migration Status (Current)
### Completed
- New EN audience-first navigation is implemented in [docs/.vitepress/config.mts](docs/.vitepress/config.mts).
- EN content has been copied into the new folder structure under:
- [docs/en/get-started](docs/en/get-started)
- [docs/en/players](docs/en/players)
- [docs/en/server-owners](docs/en/server-owners)
- [docs/en/developers](docs/en/developers)
- [docs/en/game-documentation](docs/en/game-documentation)
- [docs/en/troubleshooting](docs/en/troubleshooting)
- [docs/en/community](docs/en/community)
- New EN section index pages created:
- [docs/en/players/index.md](docs/en/players/index.md)
- [docs/en/server-owners/index.md](docs/en/server-owners/index.md)
- [docs/en/developers/beammp-scripting/index.md](docs/en/developers/beammp-scripting/index.md)
- [docs/en/troubleshooting/index.md](docs/en/troubleshooting/index.md)
- Legacy EN paths are preserved via rewrites in [docs/.vitepress/config.mts](docs/.vitepress/config.mts), so old links continue to resolve.
- Non-English locales currently remain on the legacy nav to avoid disruption.
### Safety / Data Retention
- No markdown content has been deleted.
- Legacy EN files remain in their original locations.
- New EN files exist in parallel for validation.
### Pending
- Validate UX and navigation flow with team feedback.
- Decide whether to:
- keep dual-path support longer, or
- switch to new EN canonical paths and deprecate old EN paths later.
- If approved, repeat migration process for DE/FR/ES/IT/RU/ZH.
- Optional clean-up phase (only after approval and backup): remove EN duplicates no longer needed.
## Open Questions for Team
1. Should “Troubleshooting” be a top-level item or integrated into each audience section?
2. Should “Game Documentation” appear before “Developers” for visibility?